www.nejdc.net - jump to home page

New England Juvenile Defender's Center - Blank Page

Publications

Motion Bank

Media Tips and
Information

Legislative Info

Links

Educational Resources

Wednesday, October 22, 2003

EDITORIAL: Youth center investigation moving in right direction

Court documents contend this: Lars Olsen, superintendent of the former Maine Youth Center, not only knew about, but approved of a teenage resident's repeatedly being locked in solitary confinement and shackled for far longer than the center's policies allow.

These are only allegations, but they are extremely troubling. Thus it is only right that the state Department of Corrections announced this week that Olsen will step down while an investigation ordered by Gov. Baldacci takes place. The probe stems from charges in a lawsuit by the teenager alleging that Olsen and 13 other current and former state employees violated youth center rules that limited the use of solitary confinement and restraint.

IT IS BEST THAT Olsen not lead the facility in South Portland - now rebuilt and known as the Long Creek Youth Development Center - until the facts of the matter can be determined.

The governor is also to be commended for announcing Tuesday that he has selected an independent investigator, Portland lawyer Ralph Lancaster, to lead the probe.

It's a good choice for several reasons. Lancaster has a strong investigative background - he formerly was an independent counsel investigating charges of impropriety against U.S. Labor Secretary Alexis Herman. Also, he is known as thorough and even-handed.

Additionally, putting Lancaster in charge shifts the responsibility for the investigation away from Corrections Commissioner Martin Magnusson. Magnusson was the wrong choice to look into the matter because it involves his department and he is a named defendant in the lawsuit.

MAGNUSSON announced Tuesday that Rodney Bouffard, the youth center's manager of operations, will become interim superintendent. Bouffard is not named in the lawsuit and appears to be a good choice.

He was credited with producing positive change at the Augusta Mental Health Institute as superintendent there from 1996 to 2000.

In his two years at the youth center, he's spoken out for rehabilitating the residents there - who range in age from 11 to 21 - instead of punishing them.

That wasn't the way that Michael T., a former youth center resident who is now 21, says he was treated. His lawsuit alleges shocking instances of repeated abuse during five incarcerations between 1995 and 1999.

It says that in one instance, the teenager was locked up alone in a cell for nearly three months - even though the youth center's policy at the time limited solitary confinement to three days.

ACCORDING TO the suit, he also was shackled with restraints for more than two days - 49 hours - when the center's maximum allowable time was just 30 minutes. He claims he remains emotionally and physically damaged from his treatment.

His complaint alleges that Olsen, superintendent since 1998, was among senior staff members who authorized and approved such measures. In fact, Olsen is alleged to have personally ordered or approved the youth's confinement beyond set policy limits 27 times.

Olsen is being reassigned to the Department of Correction's central office in Augusta while the investigation is pending. That is appropriate.

However, if the governor should determine the allegations against Olsen are substantially true, mere transfer isn't enough: He should be fired for cause.

CORRECTIONS OFFICIALS contend in court papers that - even if the allegations are true - youth center policies allowed set limits to be exceeded at times. However, that argument doesn't justify such excessive and abusive treatment as this teenager allegedly received.

Also, it calls into question officials' contention that residents are no longer kept in isolation at the new $34 million Long Creek facility and restraint times now are "measured by minutes."

Yes, that is the policy - but it appears youth center disciplinary policies haven't been followed before. What is the actual practice at Long Creek now? That's something that Lancaster's probe should scrutinize, too.

 

Back to Long Creek Articles

 

 

 



Questions or Suggestions? Please Email Us.

© 2004 by Judy Wong | Website Design by Alex Beuscher

All Rights Reserved.